The poet William Stafford set himself the task of writing a poem a day. When someone asked him what he would do when his poem-of-the-day wasn't very good, he replied "I simply lower my standards." In order to increase output, the bar here is set at a low level - the point of this is to have some fun with current events and politics. I welcome contributions and comments. Now you can also follow Doggerelo on Twitter (@doggerelo). Because of continuing medical problems, I'm no longer able to post a poem-a-day. I'll continue to post poems, but at a reduced frequency, so please stay tuned.

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Mitt Picks Paul Ryan


Paul Ryan’s the one Mitt picked for VP
He’s hoping his base will shout out with glee
And right-wingers surely have cause to rejoice
They’ve finally got someone who speaks with their voice.
Independents, however, may not be so sure
His budget ideas make them insecure.
The tax cuts he plans will make richer the rich
He’ll cut lots of programs, but he won’t say which.
There’s no one less loved that the House GOP
Ryan’s one of their leaders, nearly all would agree.
All Ryan’s proposals Mitt now must defend
We’ll see how it all turns out in the end,
But Mitt’s opened himself to fearsome attack
Ryan’s now a big target on Mitt Romney’s back. 

Paul Ryan for VP?

Both the Wall Street Journal and Rich Lowry, editor of the National Review, have strongly urged Mitt Romney to select Paul Ryan as his running mate. Ryan is chief budgetary bĂȘte noir of the American left because of his budget proposals, which involve big tax cuts for the rich, “broadening the tax base” (which means the rest of us pay more taxes), putting Medicaid on a strict allowance (block grants) and transforming Medicare to a “premium support” (or voucher) system.  A Ryan choice would shift the electoral debate away from Bain and the economy toward policy issues, and so perhaps this would be a good thing.  As Rich Lowry puts it, “Ryan would inject a jolt of energy into the campaign and reorient the debate around policy. The Romney campaign doesn't have to be reckless. It does have to have a pulse.”  Nevertheless, a Ryan choice carries a certain amount of risk, and, given Mitt’s track record with regard to courage, it seems more likely that he will choose Tim Pawlenty (yawn) or Rob Portman (who’s he again?).


Mitt Romney’s under pressure now
To pick Paul Ryan as his Veep
He’s more conservative than thou,
He dreams of budgets in his sleep
He’s really smart, or so they say,
The doubts of wing-nuts he’d allay.

They say he has a lot of guts
Because his economic pitch
Entails primarily huge tax cuts
That’d give more money to the rich,
And to satisfy the right wing’s prayer,
He’d do away with Medicare.

The Wall Street Journal says Mitt should
Select Paul Ryan for his Veep
It’d show the world just where he stood -
It’d be a bold, decisive leap -
And that is just the reason why
Poor Mitt’s unlikely to comply.

Friday, August 10, 2012

Why Chris Christie Won't be Romney's Pick for VP

Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey is the conservatives’ heart throb as a Vice-presidential pick for Mitt Romney.  His legendary outspokenness is refreshing in this time of focus-grouped sound bites. He’s a verbal bull in a china shop, however, and has recently called out some Republicans as bigots because they have objected to his associations with certain Muslims.  This is not the kind of thing that goes over well in today’s Republican party.   
  
Christopher Christie has a big mouth
What he says is just what he means
He’s befriended some Muslims and that has led
To some unpleasant right-wing scenes.
So Christie says that those folks are just bigots
And that really makes them pissed.
That’s the trouble with someone who means what he says,
He irritates folks that he's dissed.

Romneycare: Gag or Brag?

Responding to a dickish ad put out by an Obama Super Pac, in which a guy laments his wife’s death from cancer following the loss of his job (and health insurance) at a company taken over by Bain (honestly, guys, you’re better than this), a Romney spokesperson snatched defeat from the jaws of victory by mentioning the unmentionable: “To that point, if people had been in Massachusetts, under Gov. Romney’s health care plan, they would have had health care”  Conservatives, including Rush Limbaugh, were apoplectic: “I don’t know the people at the Romney campaign but I’m gonna tell you…your candidate is accused of killing a woman because … this isn’t about health insurance! They’re out there saying that your guy killed this woman! and your answer is well she’d of had health insurance if she lived in Massachusetts.”

Health care in the State of Bay
Is something they should never say
Because it was Mitt Romney’s plan
And since his own campaign began
His program he tries not to mention
Because it’d just bring more attention
To Mitt’s role in putting there
The model for Obamacare.

So was this just a bad mistake
By an inexperienced flake?
Or is it really something now –
To have your cake and eat it too:
‘Though Rommey’s plan has great appeal
Obama’s plan we’ll still repeal.
If this is Mitt’s health care defense
It simply doesn’t make much sense. 

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Mitt's Taxation Creation


Mitt Romney’s tax reform proposal offers to reduce everyone’s tax rates by 20%, paying for it by reducing unspecified “tax expenditures”.  The Tax Policy Center declared that the plan "would provide large tax cuts to high-income households, and increase the tax burdens on middle- and/or lower-income taxpayers." Other economists and commentators piled on.  Paul Krugman, for instance, says "Romney is scamming voters, claiming not only that he can make up the lost revenue by closing unspecified loopholes, but that he can do so in a way that doesn’t shift the tax burden away from the rich onto the middle class. He can’t, as a matter of sheer arithmetic — which is the point of that Tax Policy Center study.”

On tax reform we’ve reached accord
I’ll cut tax rates across the board
And so we don’t lose revenue
I’ll cut away some loopholes too.
Which ones are those? You’ll have to guess -
I’m not quite sure, I must confess.
It works out well for guys like me
Our tax declines substantially.
I’m sorry, but the rest of you
Will pay more than you used to do.

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

"Nice" Gays: An Insidious Plot

Louis Sheldon, of the Traditional Values Coalition, complains that TV shows invariably portray gays as “nice” and sees in this a conspiracy “to desensitize Americans to the genuine risks of the homosexual agenda”.

 …homosexuals are invariably portrayed as funny, sensitive and caring individuals. At the same time, critics of homosexuality are portrayed as bigoted and ignorant homophobes who have to learn to accept homosexuality as a valid lifestyle choice. Yet behind the scenes, how many people realize that organizations such as the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation actually have veto power over many of these scripts and can actually force directors and producers to rewrite dialogue that casts an unflattering light on homosexuals?


There’s no one nicer than gays
That’s what the TV conveys
It’s easy to see
That LGTB
Controls what the network portrays.

If everyone thinks gays are nice
No one will think it’s a vice:
Being queer is just great
It’s no fun being straight
Add gays to your life for some spice.

But gays for a long time have planned
Gay marriage to make law of the land
There’s only one way
To stop this today
From TV they ought to be banned.


Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Mitt the Wimp


Several Republican leaders, including John Boehner and John McCain, have spoken out against Michelle Bachmann’s paranoid claim that the Muslim Brotherhood is infiltrating the US government and that one of Hillary Clinton’s chief aides, Huma Abedin, should be investigated for her possible role in this scheme.  Mitt Romney, however, refused to characterize Bachmann’s charges at all, saying “I’m not going to tell other people what things to talk about. “  On a scale of forthrightness, this is right down there with his remarks on Rush Limbaugh’s characterization of Sandra Fluke as a “slut”, when he said “not language I would have used”.   He has also refused to dissociate himself from Ted Nugent’s rants against Obama.  If there’s any issue that might provoke controversy within the Republican Party, Mitt refuses to take sides. 
  
Michelle Bachmann’s making the claim
The Brotherhood’s got a con game
That’s part of insidious plots
To take over government slots.

She gave Huma Abedin’s name
Who Hillary’s aide became.
Even Republicans said
That Bachmann was out of her head.

So what did Mitt Romney do?
Did he say Michelle’s crazy too?
He said that there’s simply no way
He’d tell others what they should say.

This is a pattern of Mitt’s
When the going gets tough, Mitt quits.
He won’t take a stand in the end
If there’s someone he might offend.

What kind of leader is this,
Who’s afraid to get anyone pissed?
Mitt Romney waffles a lot
A profile in courage he’s not.